🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Selecting the right medical coverage for companies – or for our families – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It Is Costly

According to recent research, the average family pays $27,000 annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements regarding subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. How medical professionals get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee making moderate income pays about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I know multiple clients who are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that with comprehensive systems, those payments also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to funding medical services. When you add those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. There would be both an employee and company payments. And, like many our government's defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complex (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies as we no longer have access to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with increased taxation required, would remain a better and more affordable approach for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, according to major studies. Maybe one positive aspect amid present circumstances could be that we take serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.